Showing posts with label jail. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jail. Show all posts

The Sold Out Generation


The term,"United States of Australia"(Australia is termed as "Ausfailia"), a satirical version on Australia originated from the authors Encyclopedia Dramatica intended to provide a lighter view to its audience.

Recent events however are true to this term, but it is no laughing matter.  Right now, a somber crowd in London are holding a vigil in hope that Julian Assanges detainment does not lead to extradition.  No new reports on how Wikileaks founder is fairing in Wandsworth prison apart from the day after his arrest.  The same reports have recycled with inconsistencies on whether or not Julian has access to the internet.  What is consistent, is that he is in solitary confinement, that the United States government are mounting a case against him and there is a widely held consensus amongst legal experts that Sweden will deliver Mr Assange to the US.

Only when there was outrage, did the Australian government change their position on Julian Assange, stating that the United States government should tighten their security.  The sad fact is that this in Australia is a generous extension compared to previous government stances when expat Australians needed intervention.

Australia on their record of Human Rights has had the "Stolen generation", the "Forgotten generation" and now the "sold out" generation.  The sold out generation are the ones whom the governments have abandoned because of trading alliances and loyalties above the priority of its own.  Here are a few cases of the sold out generation:

Schapelle Corby

Whilst Australia does not benefit financially from its alliance with Indonesia, the government considers its relationship "strategically important" as 60% of its exports pass through Indonesian waters.
Shappelle Corby was charged by Indonesian authorities for transporting 4kg of marijuana to Indonesia.  She is currently confined in an Indonesian prison for 20 years.  The case was reportedly riddled with corruption and despite evidence proving that she was Innocent, the Australian government prioritized its loyalties to Indonesia above its own.  Although Shapelle Corboys case has never been tried in Australia, her book was censored under legislation that prevents. "Proceeds of Crime".

You can help Shapelle Corby here.

David Hicks

On the verge of signing the 2004 Australia-United States Free trade agreement, David Hicks was formally charged with conspiracy to commit murder, attack civilians and civilian objects and terrorism,attempted murder, and aiding the enemy by United States military commission. Amnesty International noted that the military commission did not meet the international standards for fair trials.  The Australian Government was aware of David Hicks case from the moment he was delivered to United States.  In fact it was Australian Officials that David hicks was originally interrogated by.  During his detainment at Guantanamo, David Hicks described being repeatedly beaten, restrained, blindfolded, enforced to taken unknown medication, sleep deprived and constrained to a small cell for a year without sunlight and exercise.  David Hicks father had requested that the Australian government intervene and bring David Hicks to complete the remaining sentence in Australia.  There were many public pleas, but it was not until 2007 that David Hicks arrived in Australia, five years after enduring Guantanamo.  Australian Officials were well aware of the torture on Guantanamo making little effort to release David in contrast to Swedish and British authorities on detainee release.

Kerry and Kay Danes


Just as Australia had set its sights upon building stronger economic ties to ASEAN, Kerry and Kay Danes were imprisoned by Laos authorities for allegedly stealing from a gem mine.  Kerry and Kay operated a security company in Laos when they noted in their account that when the company was doing particularly well, that was when all the trouble began.  The following article, that I note was deleted from ABC website, revealed that Laos officials had stated that they were willing to let Kerry and Kay Danes go if another couple was willing to stand in their place.

The foreigner Prison Support Service makes an interesting point when they place webster's definition at the top of their report.  

During their confinement, they were placed in a 3x3 metre cell with 11 other inmates where they endured torture and harsh conditions.  According to the Foreign Prison Support Service report, Kerry was detained in the presence of the Australian Embassy.  It took 11 months for the couple to be released by Australian authorities.  


And there are more
There are many more cases appearing from the outset that these people have committed heinous crimes, but instead become victims of corruption and global politics.  Where the Australian government has finally intervened is often at a later stage when the damage is already done or when enough people know that these people are innocent of the crimes that justified torture.  What has become clear in these three cases is that there was a delay because there are financial ties with each country.

We know from these historical jailings of Australians that the government will prioritize their ties with other countries above people and we are learning more about that through the cablegate leaks.  Most of the world agrees that the charges against Julian Assange is not legal or even valid.  People from across the political spectrum have spoken out against it.

We also know that the United States government has been very vocal about seizing the opportunity to have Julian extradited whilst he is detained to face charges from laws that they are updating to ensure that Julian Assanges actions are deemed "illegal".  Julian Assange and his organisation are doing what journalists across the globe do everyday and that is providing the information to the public.  The only difference is that the organisation is shaped in a way that protects its sources from retaliation.

If United States do successfully charge Julian Assange under an updated version of the Espionage Act, then it will become a landmark case that will kill the media around the world.  It is why it is vital that this does not occur.  Tools such as writing recording and publishing is a vital resource for accountability that protects us and provides some constraints on what would be enacted freely in silence.  It is why it is so important to support Wikileaks and its members, by participating in protests, signing petitions,  writing letters to government and donating to Wikileaks.

INHUMANE: The Confinement Of Julian Assange


The main website glosses over with its educational programs, counselling services and gymnasium.  The devil, of course is always in the detail, buried within the reports from the chief inspector of prisons.  The grim picture of Wandsworth prison reflects the atmosphere described within these reports.  It was six years ago when the prison was last in the spotlight for being in a terrible state.  Over-crammed, cruelty to prisoners and neglect was the prime feature in news reports that dissipated from the spotlight whilst the situation lingered.

Julian Assange is spending time in jail right now for charges that have not been substantiated.  The charges were brought by Swedish prosecution were initially dropped and then raised again.  The charges include molestation, a charge usually brought against pedophiles, yet there are no children involved in this case.  The case has been brought against Julian Assange over the malfunction of a condom where the alleged victims state was deliberate.  The facts surrounding the case, makes the allegations dubious based upon the statements of the two women whom have stated that sex was consensual.  The only reason why they inquired to the police initially, was to see if they could get him to take an STD test.  Swedish law surrounding STD tests, is greatly contrasted to the charges made against him.  The procedure is that the law can force someone to take an STD test, but only initiate charges if he knowingly transferred an infection.  Given the extensive details of the case leaked to the media by the women, the charges do not even loosely warrant rape, coercion or sexual molestation as defined in the Swedish penal code.

Whilst Sweden was commended upon being a country that established good practice in promoting womens rights, well known feminists are now condemning the treatment of Julian Assange and particularly the misuse of laws.  Since the publicity over these charges, the United States government have been preparing to cash in on the opportunity by planning to extradite him to be tried under the Espionage Act.

Along with recent leaks revealing the strong ties between Swedish and US intelligence, it has become obvious that the detainment of Julian Assange was never about rape, but a means for the US government to retaliate against recent releases of war crimes and corruption on behalf of their administration.  Increasing news reports have been confirming links between one of the women to the CIA.  The media surrounding this case has shifted the spotlight away from the crimes committed by the American government to debate surrounding the actions of Wikileaks founder and what should be done to him.    Many reputable organisations have released statements condemning the detainment of Julian Assange, echoing the chorus of his lawyer that this is not a prosecution, but a persecution.  The facts surrounding the case, the public statements from governments clarify that the case against Julian Assange is entirely political.

Well respected journalists, commentators and activists have spoken out on this issue, particularly their  concerns about the treatment of Julian Assange whilst in confinement.  Rightfully so is anyone to be concerned about his treatment, not only because of the statements of retribution made by senior members of government, but also the state that Wandsworth prison is in.  It was only last year, that it was reported to be plagued with cockroaches, unhygienic and the general morale towards prisoners is already considered abusive.  Just under a quarter of the prison population reported feeling unsafe and there were an unusually high number of suicide attempts.
Upon legal analysis, Julian Assange could be fighting extradition for up to a year and thus remaining under these conditions during that phase.    Without substantiated charges, no innocent person should be confined especially under these conditions.  The detainment of Julian Assange is not only an attack on freedom of speech, but a blow to human rights everywhere.  It sends a dark message to the rest of the world, "If you help whistle blowers, we will get you jailed one way or another".