Words to describe Wikileaks releases are:
1. "Illegal"
Leaks from both the Iraq, Afghanistan war diaries demonstrated how United States repeatedly broke the treaty on convention against torture. UN chief investigator Manfred Nowak, called upon the United States government to investigate war crimes after the Iraq release.
Iraq war logs: UN calls on Obama to investigate human rights abuses. Read more here. |
2. "..puts peoples lives in danger"
The United States government has either directly threatened or taken no legal action against its citizens on murdering Julian Assange and his family. In the afghan documents, Amnesty pointed out that the United States had no consideration of the civilians lives in Afghanistan:
3. "...threatens US national security"
As pointed out by the Australian Lawyers for Human Rights President Stephen Keim, the threat posed to Wikileaks and its members is a threat to the freedom of speech.
To really understand not only is Wikileaks not a threat, but a protection to every nations security, one has to really delve into understanding what "National Security" means.
4. "..to solve shared problems"
Recent leaks on the Copenhagen Accord reveal how United States government monopolized global action on climate change by paying off developing countries to accept agreements that were obviously not in the interests of the planet. The fact remains, despite slight inaccuracies that global warming is occurring, that its getting worse and that we only have a few years to solve the problem before it gets to a stage beyond the capacity of human beings. The prediction of a runaway greenhouse effect remains consistent, despite the efforts of polluting companies to hire "experts" to state otherwise. Some experts have stated that if action is not taken, this will effect our children. It is no wonder that United States is the only developed country in the world that has not signed the convention on the rights of the child.
5. "An attack on the international community"
In one of the cable leaks, United States recommended nuclear weapons for Pakistan to defeat India, despite security scholoars raising concerns over the years of state sponsored terrorism. In July last year, the president of Pakistan publicly admitted to supporting and nurturing terrorist groups. The same terrorist groups that United States government have publicly stated their dedication on eradicating.
No comments:
Post a Comment