Showing posts with label Human Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Human Rights. Show all posts
INHUMANE: The Confinement Of Julian Assange
The main website glosses over with its educational programs, counselling services and gymnasium. The devil, of course is always in the detail, buried within the reports from the chief inspector of prisons. The grim picture of Wandsworth prison reflects the atmosphere described within these reports. It was six years ago when the prison was last in the spotlight for being in a terrible state. Over-crammed, cruelty to prisoners and neglect was the prime feature in news reports that dissipated from the spotlight whilst the situation lingered.
Julian Assange is spending time in jail right now for charges that have not been substantiated. The charges were brought by Swedish prosecution were initially dropped and then raised again. The charges include molestation, a charge usually brought against pedophiles, yet there are no children involved in this case. The case has been brought against Julian Assange over the malfunction of a condom where the alleged victims state was deliberate. The facts surrounding the case, makes the allegations dubious based upon the statements of the two women whom have stated that sex was consensual. The only reason why they inquired to the police initially, was to see if they could get him to take an STD test. Swedish law surrounding STD tests, is greatly contrasted to the charges made against him. The procedure is that the law can force someone to take an STD test, but only initiate charges if he knowingly transferred an infection. Given the extensive details of the case leaked to the media by the women, the charges do not even loosely warrant rape, coercion or sexual molestation as defined in the Swedish penal code.
Whilst Sweden was commended upon being a country that established good practice in promoting womens rights, well known feminists are now condemning the treatment of Julian Assange and particularly the misuse of laws. Since the publicity over these charges, the United States government have been preparing to cash in on the opportunity by planning to extradite him to be tried under the Espionage Act.
Along with recent leaks revealing the strong ties between Swedish and US intelligence, it has become obvious that the detainment of Julian Assange was never about rape, but a means for the US government to retaliate against recent releases of war crimes and corruption on behalf of their administration. Increasing news reports have been confirming links between one of the women to the CIA. The media surrounding this case has shifted the spotlight away from the crimes committed by the American government to debate surrounding the actions of Wikileaks founder and what should be done to him. Many reputable organisations have released statements condemning the detainment of Julian Assange, echoing the chorus of his lawyer that this is not a prosecution, but a persecution. The facts surrounding the case, the public statements from governments clarify that the case against Julian Assange is entirely political.
Well respected journalists, commentators and activists have spoken out on this issue, particularly their concerns about the treatment of Julian Assange whilst in confinement. Rightfully so is anyone to be concerned about his treatment, not only because of the statements of retribution made by senior members of government, but also the state that Wandsworth prison is in. It was only last year, that it was reported to be plagued with cockroaches, unhygienic and the general morale towards prisoners is already considered abusive. Just under a quarter of the prison population reported feeling unsafe and there were an unusually high number of suicide attempts.
Upon legal analysis, Julian Assange could be fighting extradition for up to a year and thus remaining under these conditions during that phase. Without substantiated charges, no innocent person should be confined especially under these conditions. The detainment of Julian Assange is not only an attack on freedom of speech, but a blow to human rights everywhere. It sends a dark message to the rest of the world, "If you help whistle blowers, we will get you jailed one way or another".
Labels:
charges,
Human Rights,
jail,
Julian Assange,
prison,
Wandsworth
Wikileaks Protests
View Wikileaks Protests in a larger map
Argentina:
Manifestación en contra de la detención de Julian AssangeTime: 5:00pm - 7:00pm
Date: Monday, December 13
Location: Av. Colombia 4300
Australia:
Time: 1:00pm - 2:30pm
Date: Sunday, December 12 ·
Location: SA Parliament House
Time: 12:00pm - 1:00pm
Date: Saturday, December 11
Location: Hobart Parliament LawnsProtest to Defend Wikileaks and Julian Assange - Canberra
Time: 5:30pm
Date: Thursday, December 16
Location: Garema Place, Civic
Date: Thursday, December 16
Location: Garema Place, Civic
Austria:
Time: 8:00PM
Date: Wednesday, December 22nd
Location: Vor dem Parlament in Wien
Canada:
Montreal Protest:
Date: Sunday, December 12th
Time: 1:00pm
Location: 1155 St-Alexandre Street (US consulate)
Germany:
Time: 11:00am - 6:00pm
Date: Saturday, December 11
Location: TBA
Concentração em Apoio à WikiLeaks
Time: 3:00pm - 6:00pm
Date: Saturday, December 11
Location: Largo do Chiado
Spain:
For freedom, say no to state terrorism - Madrid:
Time: 6pm
Date: Saturday, December 11
Location: Embajada británica en Madrid (British Embassy), Torre Espacio, Paseo de la Castellana 259D, 28046 Madrid
For freedom, say no to state terrorism - A Coruña
Time: 6pm
Date: Saturday, December 11
Location: Embajada de Suecia en A Coruña (Swedish Embassy): Sale del Cantón Grande a las 18.00 en el Obelisco hacía la Avenida de Linares Rivas 18-21, A Coruña, Spain
For freedom, say no to state terrorism - BarcelonaTime: 6pm
Date: Saturday, December 11
Location: Consulado General Británico en Barcelona (British General Consulate), Edificio Torre de Barcelona, Avenida Diagonal, 477, 13º, 08036 Barcelona
For freedom, say no to state terrorism - SevillaTime: 6pm
Date: Saturday, December 11
Location: Ayuntamiento de Sevilla, Plaza Nueva 1, Sevilla, Spain
Time: 6pm
Date: Saturday, December 11
Location: Consulado de Suecia en Valencia (Swedish consulate), Plaza Porta de la Mar 4, pta 8, Valencia, Spain
Time: 6pm
Date: Saturday, December 11
Location: Diputación de Zaragoza, Plaza de España 2, Zaragoza, Spain
UK:
Time: 11:00am - 6:00pm
Date: Saturday, December 11
Location: "Cumberland Gate" at Marble Arch Hyde Park. Nearest tube station - Marble Arch
Time: 4pm
Date: Monday, December 13
Location: Swedish Embassy, 11 Montagu Place, London
Time: 11:00am - 6:00pm
Date: Tuesday, December 14
Location: City of Westminster Magistrates' Court, 70 Horseferry Rd, Westminster, London SW1P
Rally for Wikileaks - Manchester
Time: 3:00pm - 5:00pm
Date: Wednesday, December 15
Location: Piccadilly Gardens, M60 1HX, Manchester
US:
Date: Thursday, December 16
Time:10:00am
Location: Front of the White House
Olympia Support Rally:
Date: December 18th 2010
Time: 1:00pm-4:00pm
Location: Heritage Park (5th Ave and Water St)
Olympia, WA
Free Bradley Manning! Free Julian Assange! Free Wikileaks DVDs!
Time: 4:30pm - 5:30pm
Date: Monday, December 13
Location: Senator Klobuchar's Minneapolis Office, 1200 Washington Ave S., Minneapolis, MN
Wikileaks National Rally for Transparency
Time: To be announced
Date: Saturday, January 15
Location: To be announced
Miami Rally in support of Wikileaks
Time: 2:00pm - 3:00pm
Date: Monday, December 13
Location: U.S. Attorney's Office Building, 99 Northeast 4th Street, Miami, FL
If you are organizing a protest and you don't see it here, simply add the details in the comments box below and announce it on the Wikileaks Protests Facebook page. The google maps page is open so anyone can add their protest. If it is abused, editing will need to be by request to the author. The Author can be contacted privately via facebook for collaboration etc.
Labels:
Freedom of speech,
Human Rights,
Julian Assange,
Wikileaks
US vs WIkileaks: The Words They used
Words to describe Wikileaks releases are:
1. "Illegal"
Leaks from both the Iraq, Afghanistan war diaries demonstrated how United States repeatedly broke the treaty on convention against torture. UN chief investigator Manfred Nowak, called upon the United States government to investigate war crimes after the Iraq release.
![]() |
Iraq war logs: UN calls on Obama to investigate human rights abuses. Read more here. |
2. "..puts peoples lives in danger"
The United States government has either directly threatened or taken no legal action against its citizens on murdering Julian Assange and his family. In the afghan documents, Amnesty pointed out that the United States had no consideration of the civilians lives in Afghanistan:
3. "...threatens US national security"
As pointed out by the Australian Lawyers for Human Rights President Stephen Keim, the threat posed to Wikileaks and its members is a threat to the freedom of speech.
To really understand not only is Wikileaks not a threat, but a protection to every nations security, one has to really delve into understanding what "National Security" means.
4. "..to solve shared problems"
Recent leaks on the Copenhagen Accord reveal how United States government monopolized global action on climate change by paying off developing countries to accept agreements that were obviously not in the interests of the planet. The fact remains, despite slight inaccuracies that global warming is occurring, that its getting worse and that we only have a few years to solve the problem before it gets to a stage beyond the capacity of human beings. The prediction of a runaway greenhouse effect remains consistent, despite the efforts of polluting companies to hire "experts" to state otherwise. Some experts have stated that if action is not taken, this will effect our children. It is no wonder that United States is the only developed country in the world that has not signed the convention on the rights of the child.
5. "An attack on the international community"
In one of the cable leaks, United States recommended nuclear weapons for Pakistan to defeat India, despite security scholoars raising concerns over the years of state sponsored terrorism. In July last year, the president of Pakistan publicly admitted to supporting and nurturing terrorist groups. The same terrorist groups that United States government have publicly stated their dedication on eradicating.
Labels:
Cableleaks,
Diplomatic Cables,
Human Rights,
International Criminal Courts,
Julian Assange,
Obama,
Pakistan,
Pentagon,
Taliban,
United States,
US Embassy,
War Crimes,
War Diaries,
Wikileaks
Shame on Australia: Australia Should be Behind Wikileaks Founder
In the wake of signing sleazy deals with Stephen Conroy on "Filtering Threats", Robert McClelland announced that they were looking into seizing Wikileaks founders passport. To be able to seize Mr Assanges passport, they would have to establish that he is aiding terrorism. The problem is that if they reinterpret defining terrorism to include media outlets, then they risk losing all support for national security altogether. A week after the release of the Iraq war logs, Hilary Cinton announced on her visit to Australia her intentions to establish a stronger military alliance with Australia including, "cybersecurity". She strongly condemned Wikileaks prior to her visit:
The fact remains that under many definitions, Wikileaks is not a terrorist organisation. Commentators have made some good arguments against this. The pressure from world governments after the release of classified diplomatic cable data to undermine the work of Wikileaks is great. They have received heavy DDOS attacks, denied a paypal account and a domain name since its release. There is an international arrest warrant out for Julian Assange for a crime that has never been substantiated. Legal analysis, has confirmed that it is possible to transfer Julian Assange upon agreement with Sweden to United States where he can be charged for laws they introduced specifically to stop Wikileaks from publishing its releases.
Instead of defending Julian Assange as an Australian citizen and a human rights defender of free speech, the Australian government placed a considerable amount of resources into investigating whether there are any Australian laws that could put Julian Assange in custody. To date, there has been no announcement of such.
Ego- front or no ego, no human being deserves to be treated so poorly. Along with being denied access to justice, indication that he will be detained if he were to arrive in Australia would also be detained by Australian authorities. Clearly, his rights are violated here. Julian Assange should be able to go to Australia to visit his family without harassment.
Labels:
Australia,
Human Rights,
International Law,
Julian Assange,
Robert McClelland,
Terrorism,
Wikileaks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)